PFI Ban Meaning
PFI ban; The law’s requirements are strict: PFI members may be detained. Accounts can be frozen, and assets can be seized by central agencies and state police.
According to the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), 1967. The Centre has designated the Popular Front of India (PFI) as a “unlawful association.”
State police and federal law enforcement authorities now have the authority to detain organisation members. Freeze their accounts, and even seize their property. Following are some serious repercussions that could occur in accordance with the law:
- The UAPA makes belonging to a prohibited organisation a crime in Section 10. The legal minimum term for membership in a forbidden organisation is two years. But in extreme circumstances, that sentence can be enhanced to a life sentence or even the death penalty.
- According to Section 10, anyone who “is and continues to be a member of such association. Participates in such association’s meetings; contributes to, receives, or solicits any contribution for the benefit of such association; or in any other manner assists the operations of such association, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, and shall also be liable to fine.”
This also holds true for anybody who advances the goals of the prohibited organisation.
Following the SIMI’s prohibition by the Atal Bihari Vajpayee administration, central agencies and state police have throughout the years detained hundreds of SIMI members under this clause. State police have also frequently exploited this clause to detain people for supposedly belonging to the CPI, which is prohibited, in the Left Wing Extremism (LWE) plagued areas of the nation (Maoist).
- According to the legislation, if someone is found in possession of guns or explosives that cause fatalities, serious injuries, or considerable property damage, they will either face the death penalty or a sentence of between five years and life in prison.
- The UAPA’s Section 7 grants the government the authority to “prohibit use of money” by a “illegal association.”
The Central Government may, by order in writing, prohibit any person who has custody of any moneys, securities, or credits that are being used or are intended to be used for the purpose of the unlawful association from paying, delivering, transferring, or otherwise dealing in any manner with such moneys, securities, or credits or with any other moneys, securities, or credits, after an organisation is banned and the Center is satisfied following an investigation
- It also grants authorities the right to raid, search, and inspect the financial records of such organisations.
- The Center is authorised to “notify any place which in its judgement. Is used for the purpose of such unlawful organisation” under Section 8 of the UAPA. The term “place” in this context refers to a home. A structure, or a portion of one, as well as to a tent or a vessel.
The local district magistrate is required by law to compile an inventory of all the items present at the “place”. Once the Center has given notice of it and to forbid anybody from using any items that the magistrate believes may be used for “the aims of the unlawful association.”
Recently, officials utilised these measures to seize Zakir Naik’s financial and real estate holdings when the government disbanded his organisation, the Islamic Research Foundation (IRF), in 2016.